| Officer, Richard L. Purvis #4726Arizona DPS Highway Patrol
 District 13
 2610 South 16 Street
 Phoenix, AZ 85040
 Dear Officer Purvis: This is in reply to your letter of January 16, 2000, with respect to
        aftermarket clear lamp assemblies. You report that you have cited motorists for using replacement lamp
        assemblies that "have totally clear exteriors," having
        "no red reflectors on the rear product and no amber reflectors on
        the front product." You would now like to bring enforcement actions
        against sellers of this equipment, and you have asked "to have any
        Federal standards reference material that shows clearly that all U.S.
        vehicles must have the red rear reflective lenses and the amber front
        reflectors." The basic Federal motor vehicle safety lighting regulation is 49 CFR
        571.108 Standard No. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated
        Equipment. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 108 applies to
        both original and replacement lighting equipment. Title 49 U.S.C. 30115
        and Standard No. 108 require that all lighting equipment that is
        intended to replace original lighting equipment be certified as
        complying with Standard No. 108. Paragraph S5.8.10 allows the
        certification to be in the form of a DOT symbol on the product. If the
        certification is not on the product, Section 30115 requires it to be on
        a label or tag on the item or the box in which the lighting item is
        shipped. Therefore, in any enforcement action, it is important for us to
        examine the item or its container for certification to see whether the
        certification requirement of Section 30115 is being met. Table I of Standard No. 108 (applicable to trucks, multipurpose
        passenger vehicles and buses whose overall width is 60 inches or more)
        and Table III (applicable to motor vehicles whose overall width is less
        than 60 inches) require front parking lamps to be white or amber, and
        front turn signal lamps and front side marker lamps and reflectors to be
        amber, and all rear and rear side lamps and reflectors to be red,
        (except that amber is permitted as an optional rear turn signal lamp
        color, and white is required for backup lamps). The colors themselves
        must meet the requirements of SAE Standard J578c, Color
        Specification for Electrical Signal Lighting Devices, February
        1977. The colors amber and red may be produced by either a white bulb
        and amber or red inner or outer lens, or by an amber or red bulb and a
        colorless or clear lens. Manufacturers are producing amber bulbs that meet the SAE color
        requirements. Thus, a
        replacement turn signal lamp incorporating a clear lens and an amber
        bulb is permitted by Standard No. 108 if it is certified by its
        manufacturer as discussed above. However, the same lamp with a bulb that
        is clear, blue, green, or any color other than amber would not be in
        compliance with Standard No. 108. The clear lens - red bulb
        lamp raises different considerations. A red bulb is very expensive to
        manufacture, as gold must be used in order to meet the color
        specifications for red imposed by the standard. In fact, we know of no
        manufacturer who is producing a red bulb that is intended to make signal
        lamps with colorless lenses comply with Standard No. 108. Your letter recounts another problem we have encountered with this
        type of replacement taillamp, i.e., the absence of a red reflex
        reflector on the lamp, and possibly the absence of a red reflex
        reflector on the side at the rear. If the original lamp incorporated a
        red reflex reflector(s) and the replacement lamp does not (and a
        separate reflector(s) is not provided in the package), the substitution
        of the new lamp for the old one will create a noncompliance with
        Standard No. 108, as the vehicle will no longer meet the requirements of
        Tables I and III, which require red reflex reflectors and side red
        reflex reflectors. The same would be true for the front, if amber side
        reflex reflectors were absent. You
        will be interested to know that one importer, American Products Company
        of Corona, California, is currently in the process of recalling 28,542
        replacement taillamp lenses which were clear in color and lacked side
        and rear red reflex reflectors. The removal of the original lamp and substitution of one that does
        not meet the color specifications for red or any other required color,
        or the removal of a lamp incorporating a reflex reflector(s) and
        replacing it with a lamp that has none, would
        be violations of Federal law, specifically 49 U.S.C. 30122, if performed
        by a manufacturer, distributor, dealer, or motor vehicle repair
        business. You also mention that sales of this replacement equipment may be a
        violation "of the business license to sell illegal and unsafe
        safety products," and ask if we have "any federal publications
        . . . that deal with this issue." We have no publications or
        advisories that would help you. However, I would like to point out that,
        under 49 U.S.C. 30112(a), it is a violation of Federal law to sell, or
        offer for sale, any item of motor vehicle equipment unless it complies
        with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards and is
        certified as complying under Section 30115. Thus, the businesses that
        you mentioned may be violating this Section. If you have information indicating that manufacturers or distributors
        are offering noncomplying signal lamps and that motor vehicle equipment
        dealers are selling or installing them, please send this information to
        Ms. Marilynne Jacobs, Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance,
        National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street SW,
        Washington, DC 20950. We have seen no insurance industry articles of the nature that
        concerns you. If you have further questions, you may phone Taylor Vinson of this
        Office (202-366-5263). Sincerely,Frank Seales, Jr.
 Chief Counsel
 ref:108
 d.4/7/2000
 |